{"resourceId":"idaho-title33-chapter70-genai-education-2026","versions":[{"version":"external-f490f7f3c4d53e3be19fc8eed0afbf7a8ed9e7e7535ed746f6edc0d94345c7a0","resource":{"id":"idaho-title33-chapter70-genai-education-2026","title":"Idaho Title 33 Chapter 70: statewide GenAI framework required; local policies mandatory; GenAI may not replace human teachers","organization":"Idaho State Legislature / Idaho Code","sector":"K-12 state statute","geography":"Idaho, United States","publishedAt":"Added 2026, ch. 71 (Title 33, Chapter 70)","publicationDate":"2026-07-01","eventDate":"2026-07-01","sourceName":"Idaho Code Title 33, Chapter 70 — Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education (PDF)","sourceLabel":"Enacted state education statute","sourceUrl":"https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/statutesrules/idstat/Title33/T33CH70.pdf","evidenceClass":"standards-guidance","outcomeClass":"emerging","topics":["governance-procurement","data-security","accessibility-workforce","operating-model"],"finding":"Idaho Code Title 33 Chapter 70 requires the State Department of Education to develop a State Board-approved statewide GenAI-in-education framework that prioritizes human-centered oversight, transparency, safety, and data security; explicitly ensures GenAI does not replace or eliminate a human teacher; and underpins local policy, PD, procurement, and standards. Each local district and public charter must adopt a GenAI policy for students and employees covering school settings and school-issued devices, defining appropriate and prohibited uses. Framework updates convene legislators, practitioners, industry, and workforce representatives.","sledRelevance":"Binding state floor other Western/SEA clients will cite: human-teacher non-replacement, mandatory local policies, and board-approved statewide framework as procurement and operating constraints.","evidence":"Opened the legislature PDF via curl+pdftotext: legislative intent, definitions of generative AI, framework duties including human-teacher non-replacement, local policy adoption requirements, and review committee composition.","architectureImplications":"School systems need policy-linked tool allowlists on school-issued devices and configurations that keep teachers as final instructional authorities—not autonomous student decision systems.","governanceImplications":"Local boards must adopt student/employee GenAI policies aligned to the statewide framework; SEAs must maintain living framework updates with multi-stakeholder review.","securityPrivacyImplications":"Framework and local policies must address data security and PII protections consistent with Idaho and federal student-privacy duties when GenAI is used.","caveats":"Statutory requirements without published compliance rates here; quality of local policies will vary; SDE framework document already archived separately—this resource is the binding chapter text.","streamIds":["k12"],"roles":{"sales":"Sales framing: in Idaho and copycat states, lead with human-teacher continuity, local policy templates, and device-scoped allowlists. Do not pitch teacher replacement or fully autonomous grading agents.","engineering":"Engineering framing: enforce teacher-final-authority workflows, school-device policy packs, and prohibited-use blocks. Map features to local policy categories before enablement.","delivery":"Delivery framing: help districts adopt statute-aligned policies, train staff/students, and document that GenAI assists rather than replaces teachers. Acceptance is adopted policy plus configured device controls."},"roleDetails":{"sales":{"customerProblem":"Districts must meet a new state mandate for GenAI framework alignment and local student/employee policies without replacing teachers.","stakeholders":["SDE","State Board","superintendents","boards","charter leaders","counsel"],"discoveryQuestions":["Is your local GenAI policy adopted and aligned to the statewide framework?","How do you prove GenAI does not replace teacher roles in instructional workflows?","Are school-issued device GenAI controls in place?","Who owns framework-aligned PD and procurement checks?"],"valueHypothesis":"Statute-aligned policy + device control packages reduce compliance risk faster than generic AI literacy decks.","potentialEngagement":"4-week Chapter 70 localization: policy draft, device allowlist, and teacher-continuity control matrix.","unsupportedClaims":["That compliance improves test scores","Guaranteed immunity from privacy claims","That the statute endorses any specific vendor"]},"engineering":{"fit":"Fit for MDM-managed school devices and teacher-in-the-loop products; poor fit for teacher-replacement agents.","architectureIntegration":"Policy packs on school devices; teacher approval steps for instructional AI outputs; inventory of GenAI features tied to prohibited/appropriate uses.","prerequisites":["Board policy adoption","Device management","Framework awareness"],"constraints":["Local policy variation","Charter and district dual coverage","Living framework updates"],"security":"Align GenAI data flows to Idaho/federal student privacy requirements stated in local policy.","proofOfValue":["Local policy published","Device GenAI allowlist enforced in sample schools","No autonomous teacher-replacement workflow in production"]},"delivery":{"work":"Draft/adopt local policy, configure device controls, train staff and students, and schedule framework-aligned reviews.","dependencies":["Legal counsel","SDE framework","IT/MDM","principals"],"ownership":"Superintendent and board with technology and academic co-leads.","skillsAdoption":"Staff and student GenAI literacy consistent with framework guidance on digital citizenship and integrity.","governanceCheckpoints":["Board adoption","Annual policy review","Framework update response"],"acceptanceCriteria":["Adopted local GenAI policy covering required settings","Documented human-teacher continuity controls","School-issued device GenAI rules enforced"],"risks":["Paper policy without device enforcement","Feature creep recreates teacher-replacement use cases","Uneven charter/district compliance"]}},"retrievedAt":"2026-09-22T03:15:20Z","enrichedAt":"2026-09-22T03:20:19Z","enrichmentBasis":"retrieved source","accessibilityWorkforceImplications":"Framework must address accessibility/accommodations; PD workload falls on districts; human-teacher mandate protects instructional staffing norms.","procurementImplications":"Procure only tools compatible with local GenAI policy and human-teacher continuity; require vendor attestations on prohibited uses.","operatingModelImplications":"GenAI becomes a regulated local-policy domain under a statewide framework, not an optional innovation project.","sourceVerification":{"openedUrl":"https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/statutesrules/idstat/Title33/T33CH70.pdf","referenceExcerpt":"Ensure that no generative artificial intelligence replaces or eliminates a human teacher","promptVersion":"sled-research-v4.0","model":null,"basis":"agent-reported inspection"}}}]}