<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/feeds/college-athletics.xml</id><title>SLED AI Adoption Intelligence · College Athletics</title><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/feeds/college-athletics.xml"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics"/><updated>2026-09-14T03:06:16.229Z</updated><author><name>Lighthouse Advisory</name></author><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-13</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 08 · 2026-09-13</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-13"/><updated>2026-09-14T03:06:16.229Z</updated><published>2026-09-13T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Two newly archived sources examine collegiate tennis injury classification and independent soccer-model scrutiny. One pattern focuses on error-aware acceptance tests. Neither demonstrates injury reduction or a release since the last completed run. Recruiting, compliance, facilities, measured ROI and smaller-program implementation remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Two newly archived sources examine collegiate tennis injury classification and independent soccer-model scrutiny. One pattern focuses on error-aware acceptance tests. Neither demonstrates injury reduction or a release since the last completed run. Recruiting, compliance, facilities, measured ROI and smaller-program implementation remain gaps.

2 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Test injury-class errors before accepting headline accuracy
What missed-event rate and alert workload would make the proposed workflow unacceptable?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-12</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 07 · 2026-09-12</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-12"/><updated>2026-09-13T03:03:41.298Z</updated><published>2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Two newly archived sources cover Morgan&#39;s funded student-athlete chatbot plan and international scrutiny of soccer recruiting models. Neither establishes measured collegiate benefit or a new-since-last-run release. Zero cross-source patterns; independent deployment outcomes, ROI, facilities and smaller-program evidence remain gaps. Role guidance proposes bounded evaluation, data protection and accountable human decisions.</summary><content type="text">Two newly archived sources cover Morgan&#39;s funded student-athlete chatbot plan and international scrutiny of soccer recruiting models. Neither establishes measured collegiate benefit or a new-since-last-run release. Zero cross-source patterns; independent deployment outcomes, ROI, facilities and smaller-program evidence remain gaps. Role guidance proposes bounded evaluation, data protection and accountable human decisions.

2 sources · 0 cross-source patterns</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-11</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 06 · 2026-09-11</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-11"/><updated>2026-09-12T03:05:06.915Z</updated><published>2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Three newly archived sources cover BYU&#39;s sports-video development workflow, Towson&#39;s announced staff-contract AI access, and international sprint-screening limits. One supported pattern calls for checking headline descriptions against implemented methods. No new-since-last-run release, causal athletic gain or hiring improvement is claimed. Independent collegiate validation, measured ROI, student-athlete recruiting/compliance outcomes and facilities remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Three newly archived sources cover BYU&#39;s sports-video development workflow, Towson&#39;s announced staff-contract AI access, and international sprint-screening limits. One supported pattern calls for checking headline descriptions against implemented methods. No new-since-last-run release, causal athletic gain or hiring improvement is claimed. Independent collegiate validation, measured ROI, student-athlete recruiting/compliance outcomes and facilities remain gaps.

3 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Check implementation details against headline model descriptions
Can the team identify the model, dataset split and implemented baseline behind each decision-relevant result?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-10</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 05 · 2026-09-10</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-10"/><updated>2026-09-11T03:04:24.649Z</updated><published>2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Three newly archived sources cover Division II qualifier-processing errors and correction, Toledo&#39;s reported staff training and coaching workflows, and Australian sport-specific operating controls. One supported pattern emphasizes testing exception and appeal paths. No causal performance gain or new-since-last-run release is claimed. Independent deployment validation, recruiting/compliance outcomes, facilities and Division III evidence remain gaps; several recent or publisher downloads were inaccessible.</summary><content type="text">Three newly archived sources cover Division II qualifier-processing errors and correction, Toledo&#39;s reported staff training and coaching workflows, and Australian sport-specific operating controls. One supported pattern emphasizes testing exception and appeal paths. No causal performance gain or new-since-last-run release is claimed. Independent deployment validation, recruiting/compliance outcomes, facilities and Division III evidence remain gaps; several recent or publisher downloads were inaccessible.

3 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Test exception and appeal paths before relying on routine success
Can an affected athlete obtain a timely, independently checked correction when an AI-assisted result omits them or mishandles an exception?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-09</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 04 · 2026-09-09</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-09"/><updated>2026-09-10T03:04:30.604Z</updated><published>2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Two newly archived sources distinguish Rice&#39;s operational dashboard from predictive development and test the limits of broadcast AI tracking. One supported pattern calls for separate validation of measurements and downstream predictions. No new-since-last-run publication or causal athletic benefit is claimed. Recent-source access, independent collegiate outcomes, recruiting/compliance and smaller-program evidence remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Two newly archived sources distinguish Rice&#39;s operational dashboard from predictive development and test the limits of broadcast AI tracking. One supported pattern calls for separate validation of measurements and downstream predictions. No new-since-last-run publication or causal athletic benefit is claimed. Recent-source access, independent collegiate outcomes, recruiting/compliance and smaller-program evidence remain gaps.

2 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Validate measurement and prediction as separate layers
Which input-quality checks and independent predictive tests must pass before estimates inform a consequential athletic decision?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-08</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 03 · 2026-09-08</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-08"/><updated>2026-09-09T03:04:40.715Z</updated><published>2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Three newly archived sources cover Maryland&#39;s attributed data/AI operating gains, NCAA abuse-monitoring triage and independent scrutiny of sports-medicine model maturity. One supported pattern emphasizes review capacity in the value case. No causal AI savings, harm reduction or new September 8 release is claimed. Independent deployment audits, recruiting/compliance outcomes and Division III implementation evidence remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Three newly archived sources cover Maryland&#39;s attributed data/AI operating gains, NCAA abuse-monitoring triage and independent scrutiny of sports-medicine model maturity. One supported pattern emphasizes review capacity in the value case. No causal AI savings, harm reduction or new September 8 release is claimed. Independent deployment audits, recruiting/compliance outcomes and Division III implementation evidence remain gaps.

3 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Include review capacity in the AI value case
Does the local pilot improve total turnaround and cost after validation, corrections and human review are included?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-07</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 02 · 2026-09-07</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-07"/><updated>2026-09-08T03:04:57.410Z</updated><published>2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Three newly archived sources cover Cal&#39;s planned fan-service AI, a historical Division II adoption/capacity baseline and international scrutiny of emotion-inference governance. None establishes causal AI savings or athletic-performance gains. One supported cross-source pattern; no new-since-yesterday publication is claimed. Independent deployment validation, recruiting/compliance outcomes and Division III evidence remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Three newly archived sources cover Cal&#39;s planned fan-service AI, a historical Division II adoption/capacity baseline and international scrutiny of emotion-inference governance. None establishes causal AI savings or athletic-performance gains. One supported cross-source pattern; no new-since-yesterday publication is claimed. Independent deployment validation, recruiting/compliance outcomes and Division III evidence remain gaps.

3 sources · 1 cross-source patterns

Service-AI ambition needs a local capacity test
Who will operate and correct the service, and does the pilot improve total effort without reducing answer quality?</content></entry><entry><id>https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-06</id><title>College Athletics · Issue 01 · 2026-09-06</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sled.lighthouseadvisory.consulting/streams/college-athletics/editions/2026-09-06"/><updated>2026-09-07T03:15:07.668Z</updated><published>2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z</published><summary>Initial college-athletics edition: four inspected sources connect an exploratory soccer-video workflow, NCAA performance-technology controls, athlete data experiences and recent international scrutiny of coaching automation. No source establishes causal AI-driven performance gains. Three supported patterns; measured ROI, recruiting/compliance deployments and smaller-program evidence remain gaps.</summary><content type="text">Initial college-athletics edition: four inspected sources connect an exploratory soccer-video workflow, NCAA performance-technology controls, athlete data experiences and recent international scrutiny of coaching automation. No source establishes causal AI-driven performance gains. Three supported patterns; measured ROI, recruiting/compliance deployments and smaller-program evidence remain gaps.

4 sources · 3 cross-source patterns

Define the workflow benefit before claiming AI impact
What task and baseline will establish whether the proposed tool is useful?

Athlete agency needs operational controls and feedback
Can athletes understand and exercise the approved choices without hidden downstream sharing?

Separate information processing from coaching authority
Which actions may the system suggest, and which require accountable human judgment?</content></entry></feed>