Lighthouse AdvisorySLED AI Adoption Intelligence
← Back to results

From the Cisco edition of November 2, 2026

Independent reportingMixedNew this fortnight

Futurum: Cisco Project Quarry brings detection-as-code to AI agents, but value depends on rule quality, full traces and neutral governance

The Futurum Group · Industry analyst firm (independent of Cisco) · Global

Publisher
Futurum Group
Original publication
Futurum Group, Oct. 30, 2026
Source retrieved
2026-11-03
Read original source

What happened

Futurum describes Project Quarry (open-sourced Oct. 28) as a rule language and engine that evaluates whole agent sessions. It argues value is capped by rule-library quality, few SOC teams have tuned detections on agent traces, and Quarry looks like a Cisco-owned Snort-style format rather than a neutral Sigma-style standard. Its 1H2026 survey (N=929) found 55% lack technical ability to detect or contain a compromised AI agent. Futurum notes Cisco says Quarry does not replace runtime authorization.

Why it matters

Moderate for SLED agencies and universities piloting AI agents: provides an independent check on Cisco's agent-detection claims (archived Cisco blog, Oct. 28) and frames what to require before adopting.

Evidence and measured results

Analyst commentary plus a cross-industry survey; no testing of Quarry. Futurum discloses AI-assisted writing.

Limitations and uncertainty

Survey is not SLED-specific; no hands-on evaluation; analyst opinion; AI-assisted content disclosed.

Put this evidence to work

Lighthouse Advisory interpretation, grounded in this source. Enriched 2026-11-03; this does not change the original publication date. Each role follows the same checklist so takeaways compare across sources.

Sales

Role takeaway
Customer problem
SLED teams deploying AI agents cannot yet detect agent misuse.
Stakeholders
  • CISO
  • SOC lead
  • AI program lead
  • Records/privacy officer
Discovery questions
  • Do your agent platforms log full sessions including tool calls?
  • Who owns agent security monitoring?
  • Is runtime authorization in place for agent tools?
Value hypothesis
Bounded: trace capture plus session rules may improve visibility into agent misuse.
Potential engagement
An agent-logging and detection readiness assessment for one use case.
Unsupported claims
  • That Quarry is an industry standard
  • Any detection accuracy
  • That detection replaces authorization

Pre-sales engineering

Role takeaway
Fit
Early-stage fit for SOCs already on Splunk piloting agents.
Architecture and integration
Rules evaluate agent session traces; findings can flow to Splunk per Cisco.
Prerequisites
  • Full agent trace logging
  • Splunk or other SIEM ingestion
  • Rule tuning capacity
Constraints
  • Cisco-owned format; no neutral governance yet
  • Starter rules only
  • Traces may contain regulated data
Security
Pair with least-privilege tool scopes and approval for consequential actions.
Proof of value
  • Replay recorded sessions through starter rules
  • Measure false positives and misses
  • Confirm trace completeness

Delivery

Role takeaway
Work
Trace capture, rule pilot and tuning record for one agent.
Dependencies
  • Agent platform logging
  • SIEM capacity
  • Privacy review
Ownership
Customer SOC with AI platform team.
Skills and adoption
Analysts need agent-trace literacy.
Governance checkpoints
  • Privacy review of trace retention
  • Review of rule portability
Acceptance criteria
  • Proposed: 100% session trace coverage for pilot agent
  • Proposed: documented false-positive rate after tuning
Risks
  • Trace gaps
  • Rule maintenance burden
  • Lock-in

Implementation considerations

Lighthouse Advisory interpretation across the operating dimensions a public-sector buyer must settle before this evidence becomes a design. Each note answers the question under its heading for this specific source.

Architecture and integration

What must connect, and where does the AI sit in the workflow?

Requires full agent session traces (messages, tool calls, MCP) to be logged to be useful.

Governance

Who approves, reviews and stays accountable for outcomes?

Watch for neutral governance; avoid committing to a single-vendor rule format without portability.

Security and privacy

What data, permissions and controls need testing?

Detection does not replace runtime authorization for agent actions.

Accessibility and workforce

Who is affected, and what skills or accommodations follow?

Agent-trace detection requires new analyst skills.

Procurement

What should contracts, pricing and exit terms secure?

Prefer portable formats; ask about governance roadmap in procurement.

Operating model

Which teams own the service once it runs?

Agent monitoring needs joint SOC and AI platform ownership.

Publication history

  1. 2026-11-02Cisco · Issue 054 resources
Read preserved resource versions (JSON)

Stable resource ID: futurum-cisco-project-quarry-agent-detection-analysis-20261030