College Athletics

Operator evidence uses vendor-claim as the available category. Athlete-level validation split and independent replication are unreported. PDF screenshots failed; extracted text supported inspection. No injury-reduction conclusion is established.

Voluntary Australian guidance, not U.S. legal advice or evidence of causal benefit. Publisher landing page confirms the guide, but its signed download failed; the substantive mirror PDF was readable. PDF screenshots failed, so checklist review used extracted text.

Practice-driven author has event-official experience; not an independent audit. Prompt tuning on known answers limits generalization. Methods cite 2024 datasets while a reference describes unpublished 2025 results. Exact event date remains unknown.

Provider report without audited recall, adjudicator reliability or controlled welfare outcomes. Some basketball-change descriptions conflict internally; those comparisons are excluded.

Self-report and nonresponse limitations; adoption percentages concern director responses, not all staff or all NCAA institutions. The source's rounded yes/no percentages sum to 101%. No raw data reanalysis.

Single-institution, moment-in-time self-reports; staff-assisted recruitment may inhibit criticism. Author copy differs in title/format from publisher listing. Exact publication day not established from the inspected PDF.

No exact publication day found. The document is broader than AI and does not validate any vendor, hosting model or injury prediction claim.

Institutional promotional announcement, classified vendor-claim to distinguish operator assertions from evaluated evidence. The September 10 IT recap is not a new grant event. Exact award and launch dates are unknown.

Normative position rather than consensus or effectiveness evidence. Sporting traditions vary; transfer to collegiate education requires local deliberation. Do not treat illustrative professional-sport anecdotes as verified causal outcomes.

Injury-label construction and classifier split details are insufficiently specified. No external validation or injury-reduction trial is established.

Announced access does not establish active use or effectiveness. Promotional claims about stronger candidate pools are not independent findings. Procurement terms and AI model details are unavailable.

English-language peer-reviewed evidence only; grey literature excluded. Predominantly male and European evidence, virtual datasets and selective cohorts constrain transfer. Review-level appraisal was inspected; underlying studies and supplement were not independently replicated.

English-language restriction, variable injury definitions and predominantly male professional cohorts constrain transfer. The review does not establish prevention benefits.

Commercially interested joint account. Sponsorship and promised service improvement are distinct; live operation as of this edition is unverified.

Empirical validation, developmental-stage questions and thresholds for benefit over non-AI alternatives remain unresolved. The example is not an actual club incident.

English-language scope, heterogeneous designs, no independent replication of included models and a February search cutoff. Not a NCAA-only assessment or proof every model fails.

Single stadium, match and broadcaster in favorable conditions; goalkeepers excluded. Data are not public because of rights restrictions. No collegiate outcome or prospective effectiveness test.

Vendor/customer account; no independent ROI verification or causal AI attribution. Reported savings cannot be assumed for other departments.

Preprint; incomplete sanction labels, zero-imputed missing wind and unadjusted altitude. No prospective NCAA evaluation. The authors' claim that incomplete labels make recall a conservative lower bound is not established; no guilt inference is warranted.

Institutional publicity and attributed experience, not independent evaluation. Operational reporting should not be counted as validated predictive AI.

Benefits are operator statements within independent journalism. Products, model versions, integrations and training completion rates are not established. Injury-prevention benefit is not demonstrated.

Operator promotion classified under vendor-claim as the available claim category, not independent reporting. No measured AI savings or competitive benefit.